Page 25 - Voices April 2018
P. 25

away from Toastmasters with my feedback again,
      and fawns and bunnies started dancing to a
      Disney tune. Nope. Didn’t happen.

          I did change my approach to feedback. I
      joined an advanced club. I geared my feedback
      to the level of the speaker I was evaluating.
      I stayed away from harsh feedback, but I
      gave experienced speakers a point by point
      analysis of how to improve their speech. Those         at the same time—at every level of speaking
      speakers appreciated the attention to detail, the      proficiency.
      description of their nervous tics while speaking,          I’ve changed my approach to evaluation again.
      and the suggestions to improve. I thought I’d          My new method is to evaluate every speaker

      figured out the evaluation formula! Hooray!            based on everyone in the room. Oh, I am still
          But my evaluations were still turning away         analytical and look for ways the speaker can
      potential members from my new club. Beginning          improve. What changed is how I do my verbal
      speakers were intimidated by the level of the          evaluations. I work at presenting a universal
      speaking and evaluating in the club. Guest             and balanced evaluation in front of the club.
      comments at the end of the meetings were very          An evaluation that instructs, inspires, and does
      informative.                                           not intimidate. I want visitors to hear care and

          “I don’t think I could join this club, I’m not     concern for every speaker in every one of my
      that good of a speaker. This is clearly an advanced    evaluations. I want them to feel comfortable
      club. Someday I might want that type of an             coming back to the club because the environment
      evaluation, but not now! I’m still too nervous to      is safe and supportive—a place to grow as a
      get up in front of people and speak. I’ll go find      speaker. After my evaluations I offer the speaker
      a beginning club to try out.”                          additional feedback—a more in depth analysis
          That club is Feedbackers Toastmasters, and we      —in a one-on-one environment.
      were happy to receive such great compliments. I            This is a new venture for me. I’ll need lots of
      was elated to think others saw I was an advanced       feedback to find out if I have the right approach.

      evaluator. It was a feather in our cap, but the        I encourage you to find the right approach for
      bottom line was; the club wasn’t attracting new        you and your club. Are your evaluations too
      members. We were too advanced, too good, too           harsh, too fluffy, or too intimidating? Listen to
      professional, too unapproachable. We were also         what your visitors have to say. Are they walking
      too small. Visitors weren’t becoming members—          out the door—never to come back—because of
      feedback was still driving them away.                  the evaluations? If so, maybe a new approach to
          The light of understanding broke through           feedback is needed. Every club is different. Look

      upon me; I was evaluating at either end of the         at yours to find out how to make it better. What
      spectrum—at the extremes. Too harsh at first—          is your feedback saying about your club?
      too advanced later on. I needed to move to the             James Wantz joined Toastmasters in 2008. He is a
      middle and find balance. I needed to evaluate as       member of New Horizons and Feedbackers. This year
      if I were speaking to every member of the club         he is serving as District 7 Public Relations Manager.



                                                                           VOICES! | APRIL, 2018             25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30